Lawsuit Claims Ford F-150 Lightning Lacks Forward Sensing System

A lawsuit alleges some 2024 Ford F-150 Lightning trucks lacked the Forward Sensing System despite sticker claims, Car Complaints reports recently.

The situation surrounding the 2024 Ford F-150 Lightning continues to develop as owners report that some trucks were delivered without the Forward Sensing System, despite the feature being listed on their official Monroney window stickers. This discrepancy has now led to a class-action lawsuit filed in the United States.

According to information detailed by Car Complaints, several F-150 Lightning units lacked the advertised front sensing feature. For buyers who rely on the accuracy of the window sticker when making a major purchase, the absence of a listed safety system represents a serious breach of expectations.

The Forward Sensing System is designed to help drivers during low-speed maneuvers by alerting them to objects in front of the vehicle with increasing audible warnings. As described by Ford, the system serves as an important aid to avoid damage during parking and close-quarters driving, making its absence particularly noticeable on a large pickup.

The lawsuit centers on owner Ibrahim Lunawadawala, who purchased his truck believing the feature was included. In April, he received a letter from Ford acknowledging the sticker misprint and offering a $100 refund. The plaintiffs argue that this amount does not reflect the actual value of the missing feature or the potential cost of installing an equivalent system.

Owners discussing the issue on F-150 Lightning forums confirm receiving similar letters from Ford. However, many say they have been unable to obtain a retrofit installation or secure compensation beyond the offered refund. According to forum participants, dealerships have not provided clear solutions, leaving owners without options to restore the missing feature.

Ford maintains that the issue stems from a misprinted sticker and that customers were properly notified. The lawsuit, however, claims that the missing feature diminishes the value of the trucks and constitutes financial harm to buyers who relied on the printed specification.

The legal outlook remains uncertain. No clear precedents have emerged for disputes involving missing but listed optional features, making the potential outcome difficult to predict. For now, the case highlights how even a single absent function can escalate into a significant controversy—particularly at a time when buyers scrutinize vehicle specifications more closely than ever.